- The angry bear jumped up against the sides of the growing tower and left deep claw marks, which ''should have been seen to'' this day up on the rocks.may be seen towould be seen towould have been seen towould see toNo correction requiredOption A
The above sentence is talking about a past incident on a present day. Hence it should use first form of verb.
- The more they listened, the more they were able to understand "needs of not just the plants and the animals" around them, but the water and the sky too.needs of not just plants and animalsneeds of just not the plants and the animalsthe needs of not just the plants and the animalsneed of not just plants and animalsNo correction requiredOption C
- The heart-pounding event took two years of "dreadful planning which included" geological surveys, engineering fears and political lobbying of United States.dreadful planning which includesstrategic planning which includedrepulsive planning which includedrepulsive planning which includesNo correction requiredOption B
In the sentence, "heart-pounding" refers to an exciting situation and a negative word should not be used to describe an exciting event.
- That customer has(1)/ written a letter(2)/ thanks the manager(3)/ for her timely help. (4)/ No error(5)12345Option C
Here Gerund should be used in the third part of the sentence to give proper meaning. Hence, replace 'thanks the manager' by 'thanking the manager'.
- If his aim is to(1)/ buy a house in the(2)/ next three years he(3)/ should start immediate saving.(4)/ No error(5)12345Option D
The word immediately is an adverb which modifies a verb. Hence, 'should start saving immediately' will be a correct usage.
- He went on attacking her (1)/ when other passengers arrived(2)/ and told him(3)/ to lay off.(4)/ No error(5)12345Option B
Replace 'when' with 'until' as 'when' fails to convey the required meaning properly.
- The space gyroscopes(1) was out of commission for three weeks after a malfunction(2) in one of its telescope(3) created orientation(4) problems.1-22-31-32-4No replacement requiredOption C
- My best friend was enough(1) presumptuous(2) to believe(3) she was welcome(4) at her teacher's party.2-31-21-42-4No replacement requiredOption B
- Anna Karenina is really a judgement(1) by Tolstoy on love and its various shades(2) while being governed by morality(3), societal mores, fate and study(4).1-42-31-32-4No replacement requiredOption A
- Direction: Out of the 3 statements given below, find the statement(s) that is grammatically correct.
A- If I had cleaned the house, I could go to the movies.
B- The survey stated that 40 of every 100 children is malnourished.
C- The fire-fighters were able to put off fire in ten minutes.All A, B and COnly ABoth B and COnly BOnly COption A
Directions(4-6): Read the sentence to find out whether there is any error in it. The error, if any, will be in one part of the sentence. If the given sentence is correct as it is, mark the answer as "No error". Ignore the errors of punctuation if any.
Directions(7-9): In the given question, four words are numbered 1,2,3 and 4. Of these, the positions of two of these words may be incorrect and need to be exchanged to make the sentence correct. Find the two words which need to be exchanged. In case the given sentence is correct, your answer is E, i.e, "No replacement required".
No comments:
Post a Comment